AILANTA
← All research
GitHub · platform policies · rights platforms · Discovery

AI trust is expanding into a rights and delegation stack

A seven-month cross-signal study measures the shift from post-hoc detection toward provenance, identity, licensing, delegated agent trust, and regulated workflows.

July 28, 2026271 GitHub projects9 reviewed platforms10 policy eventsfrozen snapshot
Main finding

A broader trust stack is forming beyond AI-content detection

The expansion hypothesis is supported, but the stack is uneven. Detection-first tools account for 32.8% of the mutually exclusive GitHub cohort; structural layers now represent 67.2%. Provenance is the deepest reusable structural layer (25 projects). Rights and licensing remain smaller in open source (0) but expose operational consent, revocation, identity, and compensation mechanisms across 9 reviewed platforms. Delegated agent trust is independently visible in 29 projects and in a production payment protocol, connecting media authenticity to a wider market for verifiable digital action.

01

Market snapshot

Four independent surfaces describe implementation supply, operational products, policy adoption, and market discourse.

67.2%

Beyond detection

Share of the mutually exclusive GitHub cohort classified as provenance, rights, delegated trust, or regulated governance.

9

Rights and trust platforms

Reviewed public products and standards with operational mechanisms.

10

Platform-policy changes

Official changes across 7 organizations.

26

Market evidence posts

Subject matches across 11 independent Discovery sources.

02

From detector to trust stack

Each repository is assigned to one primary architectural role here, so the shares sum to 100%.

Detection32.8%89 projects
Prevention and provenance9.2%25 projects
Rights and licensing0%0 projects
Delegated trust10.7%29 projects
Regulated governance47.2%128 projects

The structural shift is not the disappearance of detection. Detection is becoming one input inside a wider system that establishes origin before distribution, binds rights to people, and controls who may act or transact.

03

Five layers are converging

Implementation depth and independent market discussion do not progress at the same speed.

01

Detection

89

Post-hoc classification of synthetic media and deepfakes.

0 Discovery posts · 0 sources
02

Provenance

25

Signed origin, edit history, content credentials, and watermark verification.

17 Discovery posts · 8 sources
03

Rights and licensing

0

Consent, likeness and voice licenses, data rights, compensation, and revocation.

3 Discovery posts · 2 sources
04

Delegated trust

29

Identity, intent, authorization, and transaction controls for agents acting for people.

2 Discovery posts · 1 sources
05

Regulated workflows

129

Audit trails, approvals, policy enforcement, and accountable use in sensitive processes.

4 Discovery posts · 4 sources
04

Implementation dynamics

The open-source surface shows whether trust concepts are becoming reusable software rather than policy language alone.

DetectionProvenanceRightsDelegated trustRegulated
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul

New subject-filtered GitHub repositories by creation month. July covers 28 days. Categories overlap here because one implementation can combine several trust mechanisms.

05

Content credentials have crossed into platform infrastructure

These figures demonstrate distribution scale, but measure different things and must not be added together.

3B+

TikTok AIGC labels

Reported cumulative labels using Content Credentials, creator labels, and invisible watermarking; not C2PA alone.

100B+

Google-marked assets

Images and videos marked across Google generative-media products, alongside 60,000 years of audio.

50M

Google verification uses

Reported uses of SynthID verification before its expansion to Search and Chrome.

5

Measured provenance policy events

Official platform changes in the frozen policy timeline that explicitly include provenance.

06

Rights products are becoming operational

The question is shifting from “was this generated?” to “who authorized it, for what use, for how long, and who gets paid?”

8/9

Explicit consent

88.9% of reviewed platforms or standards expose this mechanism publicly.

5/9

Revocation or removal

55.6% of reviewed platforms or standards expose this mechanism publicly.

4/9

Compensation or revenue share

44.4% of reviewed platforms or standards expose this mechanism publicly.

8/9

Identity binding

88.9% of reviewed platforms or standards expose this mechanism publicly.

5/9

Provenance or audit history

55.6% of reviewed platforms or standards expose this mechanism publicly.

8/9

Scope and usage controls

88.9% of reviewed platforms or standards expose this mechanism publicly.

07

Policy is moving from labels to enforceable controls

A selected lower-bound timeline based only on official organization announcements.

08

Why these markets belong to one stack

The same primitives recur across media, human identity, community data, agent commerce, and regulated operations.

SubjectContent · person · community · agent
Rights stateOrigin · consent · license · authority
ControlScope · revocation · approval · policy
OutcomeVerification · payment · audit · enforcement

The common product opportunity is a portable trust record: an inspectable chain connecting identity and origin to permissions, transformations, delegated actions, and economic outcomes.

09

Representative implementations

High-traction projects from the subject-filtered GitHub cohort.

10

Cross-source market evidence

Discovery publications validate the market narrative but are not included in the GitHub project counts.